X changes its terms to bar training of AI models using its content
(techcrunch.com)
14 points by bundie 47 minutes ago
Per my experience with GenAI legal teams, that’s a no go.
It’s not been tested in court though by yandie 4 minutes ago
by 2 minutes ago
Weird this just happened. I assumed all sites with any sort of content changed their terms soon after ChatGPT hit the scene.
by matwood 4 minutes ago
"its content" indeed.
by michaelcampbell 3 minutes ago
If an artist or author can't do this, social media shouldn't be able to do it either.
If Xai wants to train on public corpus, it shouldn't be allowed to prevent its own corpus from being used.
We need regulations to limit the power grabs. Train all you like, but don't dare try to constrain to your walled gardens.
We should also probably nip the "foundation model company / also a social media company" conglomeration in the bud. by echelon 19 minutes ago
[delayed]
by teeray 1 minute ago
Artists can do this, and they do
by mgraczyk 5 minutes ago
If I have a service where a user enters any URL, like a tweet from X, and the service translates it, then if the user approves of the translation I train a translation model on that, does that violate this term? by delichon 8 minutes ago